understanding Walzer’s position on supreme emergencies and why they might justify violating the principle of discrimination.

Okay, this paper needs a lot of work. It doesn’t really seem to understand Walzer’s position, which is that only in *extremely rare* conditions can a state set aside jus in bello principles. Look at the comments. You need first to get very clear on what, according to Walzer, constitutes a supreme emergency; and why those specific conditions might justify violating the principle of discrimination. You can proceed based on a correct understanding of what Walzer is trying to argue for. please highlight your changes.